Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
One of the main objectives in the analysis of microarray experiments is the identification of genes that are differentially expressed under two experimental conditions. This task is complicated by the noisiness of the data and the large number of genes that are examined simultaneously. Here, we present a novel technique for identifying differentially expressed genes that does not originate from a sophisticated statistical model but rather from an analysis of biological reasoning. The new technique, which is based on calculating rank products (RP) from replicate experiments, is fast and simple. At the same time, it provides a straightforward and statistically stringent way to determine the significance level for each gene and allows for the flexible control of the false-detection rate and familywise error rate in the multiple testing situation of a microarray experiment. We use the RP technique on three biological data sets and show that in each case it performs more reliably and consistently than the non-parametric t-test variant implemented in Tusher et al.'s significance analysis of microarrays (SAM). We also show that the RP results are reliable in highly noisy data. An analysis of the physiological function of the identified genes indicates that the RP approach is powerful for identifying biologically relevant expression changes. In addition, using RP can lead to a sharp reduction in the number of replicate experiments needed to obtain reproducible results.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rainer Breitling
Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Patrick Armengaud
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Anna Amtmann
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
FEBS Letters
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
University of Glasgow
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Breitling et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d90529542abee8b0d17d08 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.055