Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) valid and what are the optimal cutoff points for screening cognitive impairment in elderly Chinese community dwellers?
8,411 Chinese community dwellers aged 65 or older (6,283 cognitively normal, 1,687 with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], and 441 with dementia)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Sensitivity and specificity of MoCA for detecting cognitive impairment (MCI and dementia)
The MoCA is a valid screening tool for cognitive impairment in elderly Chinese individuals when using education-adjusted cutoff scores.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been proved brief and sensitive to screen for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early dementia in some developed countries or areas. However, little MoCA data are available from mainland China. In this study, the MoCA was applied to 8411 Chinese community dwellers aged 65 or older (6283 = cognitively normal CN, 1687 = MCI, and 441 = dementia). The MoCA norms were established considering significant influential factors. The optimal cutoff points were 13/14 for illiterate individuals, 19/20 for individuals with 1 to 6 years of education, and 24/25 for individuals with 7 or more years of education. With the optimal cutoffs, the sensitivity of the MoCA was 83.8% for all cognitive impairments, 80.5% for MCI and 96.9% for dementia, and the specificity for identifying CN was 82.5%. These indicate that with optimal cutoffs, the MoCA is valid to screen for cognitive impairment in elderly Chinese living in communities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jihui Lu
Dan Li
Fang Li
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
University of Otago
Xuan Wu Hospital of the Capital Medical University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d857835c3030ff03d19f4d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988711422528
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: