Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The nu-support vector machine (nu-SVM) for classification proposed by Schölkopf, Smola, Williamson, and Bartlett (2000) has the advantage of using a parameter nu on controlling the number of support vectors. In this article, we investigate the relation between nu-SVM and C-SVM in detail. We show that in general they are two different problems with the same optimal solution set. Hence, we may expect that many numerical aspects of solving them are similar. However, compared to regular C-SVM, the formulation of nu-SVM is more complicated, so up to now there have been no effective methods for solving large-scale nu-SVM. We propose a decomposition method for nu-SVM that is competitive with existing methods for C-SVM. We also discuss the behavior of nu-SVM by some numerical experiments.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chih-Chung Chang
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Chih‐Jen Lin
National United University
Neural Computation
National Taiwan University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chang et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09b80616dfdfe7ed345102 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089976601750399335
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: