Among 40 palliative care patients with cancer-related VTE, long-term low-molecular-weight heparin was found to be an acceptable intervention and preferable to warfarin.
Is long-term low-molecular-weight heparin acceptable to palliative care patients in the treatment of cancer-related venous thromboembolism?
Long-term LMWH is highly acceptable to palliative care patients with cancer-related VTE, improving quality of life by avoiding the blood tests and poor control associated with warfarin.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with terminal cancer. Current treatment practice with warfarin has a high incidence of complications, including bleeding, poor control and recurrent VTE. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy is safer and more efficacious in this patient group, but there are concerns that daily therapy may have a negative impact on quality of life. A qualitative study was carried out to determine whether LMWH was acceptable in palliative care patients, both in the community and in-patient units. Forty palliative care patients receiving LMWH for VTE were interviewed. Participants found LMWH to be an acceptable intervention, allowing them freedom from blood tests and optimism regarding their care. It was considered a preferable therapy to warfarin, which had a negative impact on participant's quality of life. The findings of this study support the use of LMWH, first line in the treatment of established VTE in the palliative care setting.
Noble et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Venous thromboembolism in terminal cancer (n=40). Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) vs. warfarin was evaluated on Acceptability of LMWH. Among 40 palliative care patients with cancer-related VTE, long-term low-molecular-weight heparin was found to be an acceptable intervention and preferable to warfarin.