Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Applying a social constructionist perspective, this paper explores the shared characteristics of American constructions of race, sex, sexual orientation, and disability. The discussion considers how each of these statuses is constructed through social processes in which categories of people are (1) named, (2) aggregated and disaggregated, (3) dichotomized and stigmatized, and (4) denied the attributes valued in the culture. The apparent utility of the social constructionist perspective - and its dominance in American sociology - is contrasted with its infrequent application to the study of disability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Disability & Society
George Washington University
George Mason University
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Gordon et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: