Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Earlier inversions of body wave delay‐time data recorded during the ICEMELT portable broadband experiment imaged a cylindrical plume‐like low‐velocity anomaly extending to at least 400 km depth beneath Iceland, but the depth extent of the anomaly resolvable by tomography has recently been called into question. We have performed several additional resolution tests to evaluate the depth resolution of tomographic models of the Icelandic upper mantle. The distribution of paths of body waves recorded by ICEMELT can distinguish among three different types of models: (a) a wide and shallow anomaly, (b) a narrow and deep anomaly, and (c) a narrow and shallow anomaly. While tomographic models contain an element of nonuniqueness, these tests illustrate that the depth resolution of passive seismic experiments spanning subaerial Iceland is adequate for distinguishing among alternative geodynamic models.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cecily J. Wolfe
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Ingi Th. Bjarnason
University of Iceland
J. C. VanDecar
Carnegie Institution for Science
Geophysical Research Letters
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Carnegie Institution for Science
University of Iceland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wolfe et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20e03b76382611e51810f8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gl013657
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: