Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Few studies have directly compared the clinical features of neuropathic and non-neuropathic pains. For this purpose, the French Neuropathic Pain Group developed a clinician-administered questionnaire named DN4 consisting of both sensory descriptors and signs related to bedside sensory examination. This questionnaire was used in a prospective study of 160 patients presenting with pain associated with a definite neurological or somatic lesion. The most common aetiologies of nervous lesions (n=89) were traumatic nerve injury, post herpetic neuralgia and post stroke pain. Non-neurological lesions (n=71) were represented by osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthropathies and mechanical low back pain. Each patient was seen independently by two experts in order to confirm the diagnosis of neuropathic or non-neuropathic pain. The prevalence of pain descriptors and sensory dysfunctions were systematically compared in the two groups of patients. The analysis of the psychometric properties of the DN4 questionnaire included: face validity, inter-rater reliability, factor analysis and logistic regression to identify the discriminant properties of items or combinations of items for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. We found that a relatively small number of items are sufficient to discriminate neuropathic pain. The 10-item questionnaire developed in the present study constitutes a new diagnostic instrument, which might be helpful both in clinical research and daily practice.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Didier Bouhassira
Johns Hopkins University
Nadine Attal
Inserm
H. Alchaar
Université Côte d'Azur
Pain
Inserm
Sorbonne Université
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bouhassira et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d732f2447a5ff6a2b8a3a9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010