Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
WASH access and practices are generally associated with reduced odds of STH infection. Pooled estimates from all meta-analyses, except for two, indicated at least a 33% reduction in odds of infection associated with individual WASH practices or access. Although most WASH interventions for STH have focused on sanitation, access to water and hygiene also appear to significantly reduce odds of infection. Overall quality of evidence was low due to the preponderance of observational studies, though recent randomized controlled trials have further underscored the benefit of handwashing interventions. Limited use of the Joint Monitoring Program's standardized water and sanitation definitions in the literature restricted efforts to generalize across studies. While further research is warranted to determine the magnitude of benefit from WASH interventions for STH control, these results call for multi-sectoral, integrated intervention packages that are tailored to social-ecological contexts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eric Strunz
David G. Addiss
Meredith E. Stocks
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
PLoS Medicine
Emory University
University of Basel
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Strunz et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d98adc94760e72e6a3cedc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001620
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: