Intravenous sematilide prolonged repolarization (QT interval increased by 18% at high dose, p<0.025) but did not alter hemodynamic variables in patients with heart failure.
Does intravenous sematilide alter hemodynamic variables in patients with congestive heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Intravenous sematilide prolongs repolarization without depressing hemodynamic function in patients with heart failure, though high doses may be proarrhythmic.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of intravenous sematilide hydrochloride, a selective class III antiarrhythmic agent, in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Class I antiarrhythmic agents, which primarily slow conduction, can depress ventricular function, particularly in patients with heart failure. In contrast, pure class III agents, which selectively prolong repolarization, do not adversely affect hemodynamic variables in animal models, but there are no data evaluating their hemodynamic effects in humans. METHODS: In 39 patients with congestive heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction 25% and in patients with cardiac index or = 2 liters/min per m2. Sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 1) and excessive QT prolongation (n = 4) were seen during the high dose. CONCLUSIONS: Sematilide, in the doses administered, prolonged repolarization but did not alter hemodynamic variables in patients with heart failure. These data suggest that class III antiarrhythmic agents, which selectively prolong repolarization, are not cardiodepressant but may be proarrhythmic in humans, especially at high doses.
Stambler et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Congestive heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=39). Intravenous sematilide vs. Baseline was evaluated on Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic measurements. Intravenous sematilide prolonged repolarization (QT interval increased by 18% at high dose, p<0.025) but did not alter hemodynamic variables in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: