Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Adenosine-to-inosine editing is one of the most frequent post-transcriptional modifications, manifested as A-to-G mismatches when comparing RNA sequences with their source DNA. Recently, a number of RNA-seq data sets have been screened for the presence of A-to-G editing, and hundreds of thousands of editing sites identified. Here we show that existing screens missed the majority of sites by ignoring reads with excessive ('hyper') editing that do not easily align to the genome. We show that careful alignment and examination of the unmapped reads in RNA-seq studies reveal numerous new sites, usually many more than originally discovered, and in precisely those regions that are most heavily edited. Specifically, we discover 327,096 new editing sites in the heavily studied Illumina Human BodyMap data and more than double the number of detected sites in several published screens. We also identify thousands of new sites in mouse, rat, opossum and fly. Our results establish that hyper-editing events account for the majority of editing sites.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hagit T. Porath
Israel Institute for Biological Research
Shai Carmi
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Erez Y. Levanon
Bar-Ilan University
Nature Communications
Columbia University
Bar-Ilan University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Porath et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d90e57f1691594aa64f4ff — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5726