Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Charting change in behavior as a function of age and investigating longitudinal relations among constructs are primary goals of developmental research. Traditionally, researchers rely on a single measure (e.g., scale score) for a given construct for each person at each occasion of measurement, assuming that measure reflects the same construct at each occasion. With multiple indicators of a latent construct at each time of measurement, the researcher can evaluate whether factorial invariance holds. If factorial invariance constraints are satisfied, latent variable scores at each time of measurement are on the same metric and stronger conclusions are warranted. In this paper we discuss factorial invariance in longitudinal studies, contrasting analytic approaches and highlighting strengths of the multiple-indicator approach to modeling developmental processes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Keith F. Widaman
University of California, Riverside
Emilio Ferrer
University of California, Davis
Rand D. Conger
Pennsylvania State University
Child Development Perspectives
University of California, Davis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Widaman et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d765a2b843b2be9948f91b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: