During atrial fibrillation, 0.6% of wavelets conducted across ablation gaps with pacing block, compared to 68.5% across gaps without pacing block (P<0.0001).
Absolute Event Rate: 0.6% vs 68.5%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
INTRODUCTION: Linear atrial ablations are thought to be necessary to accomplish successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. In order to investigate the conduction characteristics of atrial myocardium in regions of linear lesion discontinuity (gaps), we performed activation sequence mapping in gap regions during atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In seven dogs, a linear epicardial ablation was created on the right atrial free wall with a discontinuous segment (gap) in the mid-portion of the lesion. A plaque electrode was used to measure conduction across the gap. Conduction was assessed during (1) atrial pacing from the edge of the plaque electrode during sinus rhythm, and (2) during atrial fibrillation. After each series of measurements, the lesion gap was decreased by creating additional radiofrequency ablations and repeat conduction maps were obtained. The process was repeated until conduction block was observed during atrial pacing. Gap lengths ranged from 0 to 25 mm. During atrial pacing, gaps as narrow as 2 mm demonstrated normal conduction and gaps as large as 5 mm demonstrated block during pacing. Although conduction block was never present across gaps greater than 5 mm, the ability to predict conduction block as a function of gap width was difficult for lesions 5 mm rarely demonstrate conduction block during atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation; whereas, gaps < or = 5 mm in length may demonstrate block. Lesion gaps that do not demonstrate conduction block during atrial pacing have no higher rate of functional conduction block during atrial fibrillation than fibrillating atria without ablation lesions.
Mitchell et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Atrial fibrillation (n=7). Linear epicardial ablation with discontinuous segment (gap) vs. Gaps without block during pacing was evaluated on Conduction across the gap during atrial fibrillation (p=< 0.0001). During atrial fibrillation, 0.6% of wavelets conducted across ablation gaps with pacing block, compared to 68.5% across gaps without pacing block (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: