Analysis of submaximal metabolic, ventilatory, and cardiovascular response profiles during cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides useful diagnostic and prognostic information in systemic diseases.
Highlights the clinical utility of analyzing submaximal and recovery response profiles during cardiopulmonary exercise testing for diagnosis, impairment evaluation, and prognosis.
The advent of microprocessed "metabolic carts" and rapidly incremental protocols greatly expanded the clinical applications of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The response normalcy to CPET is more commonly appreciated at discrete time points, for example, at the estimated lactate threshold and at peak exercise. Analysis of the response profiles of cardiopulmonary responses at submaximal exercise and recovery, however, might show abnormal physiologic functioning which would not be otherwise unraveled. Although this approach has long been advocated as a key element of the investigational strategy, it remains largely neglected in practice. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to highlight the usefulness of selected submaximal metabolic, ventilatory, and cardiovascular variables in different clinical scenarios and patient populations. Special care is taken to physiologically justify their use to answer pertinent clinical questions and to the technical aspects that should be observed to improve responses' reproducibility and reliability. The most recent evidence in favor of (and against) these variables for diagnosis, impairment evaluation, and prognosis in systemic diseases is also critically discussed.
Ramos et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Systemic diseases. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) response profiles was evaluated. Analysis of submaximal metabolic, ventilatory, and cardiovascular response profiles during cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides useful diagnostic and prognostic information in systemic diseases.