Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Video-taped interviews and mock ratings of typical cases were employed to evaluate raters' consistency of 37 raters (14 staff psychiatrists, 11 psychiatric residents, 10 clinical psychologists and interns, 2 nurses). Total score across time was most stable, single scale scores least consistent. Trends between professional groups were not large and not always related to degree of training, but psychologists rated typical patients more consistently, psychiatric residents showed greater across-time and inter-rater consistency. The latter varied on taped interviews with symptoms being rated. Over-all, reliabilities on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale were as high as could be expected.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Flemenbaum et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1bfce4ea84844e355f464b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1973.33.3.783
Abraham Flemenbaum
Robert Zimmermann
Psychological Reports
University of Minnesota System
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...