Premature stimulation in guinea pig hearts modulated repolarization gradients, decreasing fibrillation vulnerability by 73±45% at intermediate intervals and increasing it by 37±8% at shorter intervals.
Does a premature stimulus modulate spatial gradients of repolarization and influence vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation in guinea pig hearts?
Modulation of repolarization gradients by a single premature stimulus significantly influences vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation, representing a novel mechanism for arrhythmogenic substrate formation.
Background —Previously, we have shown that a premature stimulus can significantly modulate spatial gradients of ventricular repolarization (ie, modulated dispersion), which result from heterogeneous electrophysiological properties between cells. The role modulated dispersion may play in determining electrical instability in the heart is unknown. Methods and Results —To determine if premature stimulus–induced changes in repolarization are a mechanism that governs susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias, optical action potentials were recorded simultaneously from 128 ventricular sites (1 cm 2 ) in 8 Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts. After baseline pacing (S 1 ), a single premature stimulus (S 2 ) was introduced over a range of S 1 S 2 coupling intervals. Arrhythmia vulnerability after each premature stimulus was determined by measurement of a modified ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) during the T wave of each S 2 beat (ie, S 2 -VFT). As the S 1 S 2 interval was shortened to an intermediate value, spatial gradients of repolarization and vulnerability to fibrillation decreased by 51±9% (mean±SEM) and 73±45%, respectively, compared with baseline levels. As the S 1 S 2 interval was further shortened, repolarization gradients increased above baseline levels by 54±30%, which was paralleled by a corresponding increase (37±8%) in vulnerability. Conclusions —These data demonstrate that modulation of repolarization gradients by a single premature stimulus significantly influences vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation. This may represent a novel mechanism for the formation of arrhythmogenic substrates during premature stimulation of the heart.
Laurita et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Arrhythmia vulnerability (n=8). Premature stimulation (S2) vs. Baseline pacing (S1) was evaluated on Ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) and spatial gradients of repolarization. Premature stimulation in guinea pig hearts modulated repolarization gradients, decreasing fibrillation vulnerability by 73±45% at intermediate intervals and increasing it by 37±8% at shorter intervals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: