Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: The ever-increasing number of sequenced and annotated genomes has made management of their annotations a significant undertaking, especially for large eukaryotic genomes containing many thousands of genes. Typically, changes in gene and transcript numbers are used to summarize changes from release to release, but these measures say nothing about changes to individual annotations, nor do they provide any means to identify annotations in need of manual review. RESULTS: In response, we have developed a suite of quantitative measures to better characterize changes to a genome's annotations between releases, and to prioritize problematic annotations for manual review. We have applied these measures to the annotations of five eukaryotic genomes over multiple releases -- H. sapiens, M. musculus, D. melanogaster, A. gambiae, and C. elegans. CONCLUSION: Our results provide the first detailed, historical overview of how these genomes' annotations have changed over the years, and demonstrate the usefulness of these measures for genome annotation management.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Karen Eilbeck
University of Utah
Barry Moore
University of Utah
Carson Holt
University of Utah
BMC Bioinformatics
University of Utah
Institute of Human Genetics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eilbeck et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21c88720e5496f07eca942 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-67