Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A method is set forth by which a firm may measure and monitor, on a continuing basis, the priorities that different groups and individuals place upon a prespecified set of social goals. The article shows how the firm may then combine the differing viewpoints of these groups into a single set of priorities as a usable guide for decision-making.
Shocker et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: