Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper reconsiders the impact of immigrants over time in the US by using the technique of generational accounting introduced by Auerbach et al. Generational accounting considers not only the net contribution of immigrants to balance but also the size of this impact in relation to the overall balance. It further compares changes in immigration policy to other policies. From the analysis three conclusions were formulated. 1) Whether immigration contributes to or helps alleviate stress depends on the future generations. If the entire imbalance currently estimated for the US is placed on future generations then the presence of new immigrants reduces the burden of the natives. 2) Fiscal gain from immigration is reduced when a policy of fiscal responsibility is followed. The gain is dependent on the extent to which government purchases rise with the immigrant population. 3) The impact of immigration on balance is extremely small in relation to the size of the overall imbalance itself. Thus immigration should not be perceived as a major source of the existing imbalance or as a potential solution to it.
Auerbach et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: