Heparin and enoxaparin prolonged time to catheter occlusion by 4.6- and 2.5-fold compared with saline, whereas fondaparinux had no effect unless supplemented with low-dose heparin.
Effect estimate: Fold change 4.6 (heparin), 2.5 (enoxaparin)
In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, catheter thrombosis is more frequent with fondaparinux than heparin. This study was undertaken to identify the responsible mechanism and to develop strategies for its prevention. Percutaneous coronary intervention catheter segments shortened plasma clotting times from 971 ± 92 to 352 ± 22 seconds. This activity is factor XII (fXII) dependent because it was attenuated with corn trypsin inhibitor and was abolished in fXII-deficient plasma. Heparin and enoxaparin blocked catheter-induced clotting at 0.5 and 2 anti-Xa U/mL, respectively, whereas fondaparinux had no effect. Addition of fondaparinux to bivalirudin or low-dose heparin attenuated catheter-induced clotting more than either agent alone. In a rabbit model of catheter thrombosis, a 70 anti-Xa U/kg intravenous bolus of heparin or enoxaparin prolonged the time to catheter occlusion by 4.6- and 2.5-fold, respectively, compared with saline, whereas the same dose of fondaparinux had no effect. Although 15 anti-Xa U/kg heparin had no effect on its own, when given in conjunction with 70 anti-Xa U/kg fondaparinux, the time to catheter occlusion was prolonged 2.9-fold. These findings indicate that (1) catheters are prothrombotic because they trigger fXII activation, and (2) fondaparinux does not prevent catheter-induced clotting unless supplemented with low-dose heparin or bivalirudin.
Yau et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Catheter thrombosis. Fondaparinux, enoxaparin, and heparin vs. Saline was evaluated on Time to catheter occlusion (Fold change 4.6 (heparin), 2.5 (enoxaparin)). Heparin and enoxaparin prolonged time to catheter occlusion by 4.6- and 2.5-fold compared with saline, whereas fondaparinux had no effect unless supplemented with low-dose heparin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: