Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Conventional reviews of research on the efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatments often find considerable variation in outcome among studies and, as a consequence, fail to reach firm conclusions about the overall effectiveness of the interventions in question. In contrast meta-analytic reviews show a strong, dramatic pattern of positive overall effects that cannot readily be explained as artifacts of meta-analytic technique or generalized placebo effects. Moreover, the effects are not so small that they can be dismissed as lacking practical or clinical significance. Although meta-analysis has limitations, there are good reasons to believe that its results are more credible than those of conventional reviews and to conclude that well-developed psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment is generally efficacious.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mark W. Lipsey
David B. Wilson
American Psychologist
Vanderbilt University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lipsey et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b7d44f380e2b59dca2238 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.48.12.1181
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: