Cooling from 35 to 10 degrees C increased the curvature of the force-velocity relation in rat muscles, with slow-twitch muscle shortening velocity being more temperature sensitive than fast-twitch.
Normal physiology (rat muscle force-velocity relation)
Temperature variation (cooling from 35 to 10 degrees C) vs Different temperatures
Steady-state force-velocity relation and maximum shortening velocity
The steady-state force-velocity relation was examined at temperatures between 35 and 10 degrees C in rat fast-twitch (extensor digitorum longus, e.d.l.) and slow-twitch (soleus) muscle preparations in vitro, with direct stimulation, and employing the isotonic release technique. The curvature of the force-velocity relation increased with cooling in both muscles; the increase was more pronounced below 25 degrees C. The maximum shortening velocity of e.d.l. muscle decreased with a Q10 (temperature coefficient) of 1.8 in cooling from 35 to 25 degrees C; it decreased with a Q10 of 2.4 in cooling below 20 degrees C. The shortening velocity of slow muscle was more temperature sensitive. The Q10 values for soleus muscle were 2.0 at 35-25 degrees C and 3.5 below 20 degrees C. The maximum rate of isometric tetanic tension rise had a temperature sensitivity similar to the maximum velocity of shortening in each muscle type.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
K. W. Ranatunga
University of Bristol
The Journal of Physiology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
K. W. Ranatunga (Fri,) conducted a other in Normal physiology (rat muscle force-velocity relation). Temperature variation (cooling from 35 to 10 degrees C) vs. Different temperatures was evaluated on Steady-state force-velocity relation and maximum shortening velocity. Cooling from 35 to 10 degrees C increased the curvature of the force-velocity relation in rat muscles, with slow-twitch muscle shortening velocity being more temperature sensitive than fast-twitch.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cd3f063ecdfd686625a30 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015260