Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Several studies have applied uses and gratifications to explain Internet usage. Like Bandura’s social-cognitive theory, the uses and gratifications framework explains media use in terms of expected positive outcomes, or gratifications. However, previous uses and gratifications research accounted for little variance in Internet behavior, although there were conflicting results. This research identifies new variables from social-cognitive theory that might further explain Internet usage and resolve inconsistencies in prior research. Measures of self-efficacy and self-disparagement were developed for the domain of Internet behavior. Internet addiction was interpreted as a deficient self-regulation within the social-cognitive framework. Finally, the negative outcomes of online behavior were analyzed for their impact on Internet usage. In a survey of 171 college students, the social-cognitive model explained 60% of the available variance in Internet usage using multiple regression analysis, a significant improvement over prior uses and gratifications research.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert LaRose
Michigan State University
Dana Mastro
University of California, Santa Barbara
Matthew S. Eastin
The University of Texas at Austin
Social Science Computer Review
The Ohio State University
Michigan State University
Boston College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
LaRose et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8d107a5ecc596b5d18919 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900401
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: