The Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire demonstrated responsiveness to change across seven intervention studies, with effect sizes ranging from 0.32 to 0.65.
Systematic Review
Effect estimate: Cohen's d 0.32 to 0.65
p-value: p=<0.001 to <0.06
AIM: Responsiveness (sensitivity to change over time) is a key psychometric quality for an outcome measure. We examined the responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire, a measure of diabetes-specific emotional distress. METHODS: PAID data were obtained from seven diabetes intervention studies following a literature search that included both published papers and conference abstracts. To estimate responsiveness we used two indices: (i) a statistical test (the dependent t-test), and (ii) a commonly used effect size index (Cohen's d). RESULTS: Mean patient PAID scores improved from baseline to follow-up for all seven studies. Specifically, t-statistics ranged from t= 8.5 (P < 0.001) to t= 2.1 (P < 0.06). Effect size results ranged from 0.32 (i.e. small) for a disease management intervention to 0.65 (i.e. moderate) for an intensive medical/educational intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the pilot nature of the studies, the pattern of findings provided strong support for the responsiveness of the PAID. Information on responsiveness helps clinical researchers select measures, accurately estimate sample size to ensure adequate statistical power, and prioritize outcomes to be assessed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Diabetic Medicine
University of California, San Diego
Joslin Diabetes Center
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Welch et al. (Wed,) conducted a systematic review in Diabetes. Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire was evaluated on Responsiveness of the PAID questionnaire (change in mean patient PAID scores from baseline to follow-up) (Cohen's d 0.32 to 0.65, p=<0.001 to <0.06). The Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire demonstrated responsiveness to change across seven intervention studies, with effect sizes ranging from 0.32 to 0.65.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: