Continuous electrical activity at nonantral sites was more prevalent in persistent than in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (80% vs 57%, P<0.001).
Observational (n=44)
Does the prevalence and duration of continuous electrical activity (CEA) differ between patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation?
Continuous electrical activity at nonantral sites is more prevalent and longer in persistent than paroxysmal AF, but its high prevalence in paroxysmal AF suggests it is a nonspecific marker for ablation targets.
Absolute Event Rate: 80% vs 57%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) may play a role in the genesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). One type of CFAE is continuous electrical activity (CEA). The prevalence and characteristics of CEA in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF are unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 44 patients (age = 59 +/- 8 years) with paroxysmal (25) or persistent (19) AF, bipolar electrograms were systematically recorded for > or =5 seconds at 24 left atrial (LA) sites, including 8 antral sites, and 2 sites within the coronary sinus (CS). CEA was defined as continuous depolarization for >1 second with no isoelectric interval. CEA was recorded at the LA septum (79%), antrum (66%), posterior (68%) and anterior walls (67%), roof (66%), base of the LA appendage (61%), inferior wall (61%), posterior mitral annulus (48%), CS (41%), and in the LA appendage (14%). Antral CEA was equally prevalent in patients with paroxysmal (63%) and persistent AF (70%, P = 0.12). In patients with paroxysmal AF, the prevalence of CEA was similar among antral and nonantral LA sites, except for the LA appendage. However, in patients with persistent AF, CEA was more prevalent at the nonantral (80%) than antral sites (70%, P = 0.03). CEA at nonantral sites except the CS was more prevalent in persistent than in paroxysmal AF (80% vs 57%, P < 0.001). The mean duration of intermittent episodes of CEA was longer in persistent than in paroxysmal AF (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The higher prevalence and duration of CEA at nonantral sites in persistent than in paroxysmal AF is consistent with a greater contribution of LA reentrant mechanisms in persistent AF. However, the high prevalence of CEA at nonantral sites in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) suggests that CEA alone is a nonspecific marker of appropriate target sites for ablation of AF. The characteristics of CEA that most accurately identify drivers of AF remain to be determined.
Tada et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (n=44). Persistent atrial fibrillation vs. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Prevalence of continuous electrical activity (CEA) at nonantral sites except the coronary sinus (p=<0.001). Continuous electrical activity at nonantral sites was more prevalent in persistent than in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (80% vs 57%, P<0.001).