Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Portfolio selection models based on expected value-semivariance (E-S) criteria have been suggested as offering certain advantages over the expected value-variance (E-V) approach. Although variance is more tractable mathematically, it has not always been satisfying to financial theorists (3, pp. 278–284, 5, 6, 7, pp. 193–194, and 10, pp. 72–73). In the pioneering work in portfolio analysis, Markowitz 7, p. 194 observed that semivariance concentrates on reducing losses as opposed to variance which considers extreme gains, as well as extreme losses, as undesirable. In the presence of nonsymmetrical probability distributions, this equal weighting of gains and losses may not adequately describe the alternative portfolios available to the decision maker.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
William W. Hogan
Harvard University
James M. Warren
North Carolina State University
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hogan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0940430e219f8cdd33ef1b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2329623
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: