Low-intensity concentric blood flow restriction training significantly increased elbow flexor muscle volume by 12.5% compared to a 2.9% increase with eccentric training.
RCT (n=10)
Randomized within-subject
Open-label
No
10 healthy young men without recent resistance training experience, who underwent 6 weeks of unilateral arm curl exercises to compare concentric vs eccentric blood flow restriction training.
Concentric blood flow restriction (CON-BFR) training vs Eccentric blood flow restriction (ECC-BFR) training (30% of concentric 1-RM, 75 repetitions, 3 days/week)
Change in elbow flexor muscle volume, p=<0.01
Absolute Event Rate: 12.5% vs 2.9%
p-value: p=<0.01
We investigated the acute and chronic effects of low-intensity concentric or eccentric resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) on muscle size and strength. Ten young men performed 30% of concentric one repetition maximal dumbbell curl exercise (four sets, total 75 reps) 3 days/week for 6 weeks. One arm was randomly chosen for concentric BFR (CON-BFR) exercise only and the other arm performed eccentric BFR (ECC-BFR) exercise only at the same exercise load. During the exercise session, iEMG for biceps brachii muscles increased progressively during CON-BFR, which was greater (p<0.05) than that of the ECC-BFR. Immediately after the exercise, muscle thickness (MTH) of the elbow flexors acutely increased (p<0.01) with both CON-BFR and ECC-BFR, but was greater with CON-BFR (11.7%) (p<0.01) than ECC-BFR (3.9%) at 10-cm above the elbow joint. Following 6-weeks of training, MRI-measured muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) at 10-cm position and mid-upper arm (12.0% and 10.6%, respectively) as well as muscle volume (12.5%) of the elbow flexors were increased (p<0.01) with CON-BFR. Increases in muscle CSA and volume were lower in ECC-BFR (5.1%, 0.8% and 2.9%, respectively) than in the CON-BFR and only muscle CSA at 10-cm position increased significantly (p<0.05) after the training. Maximal voluntary isometric strength of elbow flexors was increased (p<0.05) in CON-BFR (8.6%), but not in ECC (3.8%). These results suggest that CON-BFR training leads to pronounced acute changes in muscle size, an index of muscle cell swelling, the response to which may be an important factor for promoting muscle hypertrophy with BFR resistance training.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tomohiro Yasuda
Seirei Christopher University
Jeremy P. Loenneke
Preventive Cardiology
Robert S. Thiebaud
Brigham Young University - Idaho
PLoS ONE
The University of Tokyo
University of Oklahoma
University of Mississippi
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yasuda et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Healthy (n=10). Concentric blood flow restriction (CON-BFR) training vs. Eccentric blood flow restriction (ECC-BFR) training was evaluated on Change in elbow flexor muscle volume (p=<0.01). Low-intensity concentric blood flow restriction training significantly increased elbow flexor muscle volume by 12.5% compared to a 2.9% increase with eccentric training.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2253a571fe5424977c93d2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052843
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: