High negative affect is a prospective risk factor for treated hypertension, with relative risks of 1.73 in white women, 3.12 in black women, and 1.56 in all men over up to 22 years of follow-up.
Cohort (n=3,310)
Hypertension (n=3,310)
Negative affect vs Lower negative affect
Treated hypertension — RR 1.73 (white women); RR 3.12 (black women); RR 1.56 (all men) (1.30-2.30 (white women); 1.24-7.88 (black women); 1.08-2.25 (all men))
Effect estimate: RR 1.73 (white women); RR 3.12 (black women); RR 1.56 (all men) (95% CI 1.30-2.30 (white women); 1.24-7.88 (black women); 1.08-2.25 (all men))
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that negative affect is a prospective risk factor for hypertension among white and black persons. METHODS: A population-based cohort of 3310 initially normotensive and chronic disease-free persons in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study was tracked through four follow-up waves (maximum, 22 years). The association between hypertension and baseline negative affect was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for baseline age, sex, race, education, smoking, alcohol use, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, body mass index, and change in body mass index as a time-dependent covariate. Negative affect was based on combined symptoms of depression and anxiety. Hypertension end points included 1) self-reported, 2) treated (prescription of antihypertensive medications), and 3) incident (blood pressure > or =160/95 mm Hg or treated) hypertension. Blood pressure measurements were obtained only at baseline and the first follow-up examination (maximum, 13 years). RESULTS: Increased negative affect was associated with elevated risk for self-reported, treated, and incident hypertension at first follow-up. Through four waves of follow-up, high negative affect was associated with treated hypertension in baseline risk-adjusted models for white women (relative risk RR = 1.73, 95% confidence interval 95% CI = 1.30-2.30), black women (RR = 3.12, 95% CI = 1.24-7.88), and all men (RR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.08-2.25). Time-dependent covariate models produced similar RRs. CONCLUSIONS: Negative affect is predictive of development of hypertension. For treated hypertension, white women and all men with increased negative affect had similarly elevated RRs, whereas black women with increased negative affect had substantially higher RRs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bruce S. Jonas
Bowie State University
James Lando
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Psychosomatic Medicine
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Health Statistics
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonas et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=3,310). Negative affect vs. Lower negative affect was evaluated on Treated hypertension (RR 1.73 (white women); RR 3.12 (black women); RR 1.56 (all men), 95% CI 1.30-2.30 (white women); 1.24-7.88 (black women); 1.08-2.25 (all men)). High negative affect is a prospective risk factor for treated hypertension, with relative risks of 1.73 in white women, 3.12 in black women, and 1.56 in all men over up to 22 years of follow-up.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f99a7d8c5cf602efceb9b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200003000-00006
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: