Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
It has become common practice to employ, as a binding energy reference for x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies on nonconductive materials, the C(1s) spectra of the ubiquitous (adventitious) carbon that seems to exhibit an instantaneous presence on all air exposed materials. Despite this commonality, surface scientists, including many practitioners, have expressed substantial concerns about the validity of this approach. A detailed discussion of the method is presented including consideration of the types of materials and the electronic energy states involved, e.g., Fermi edges, vacuum levels, etc., and the couplings that must exist for the referencing method to be correctly applied. A number of other surface environments for which the carbon referencing method may be fallacious are also presented. This leads to a consideration of the electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis results for different types of adventitious species and how the presence of some of these may confuse the use of the method. In this regard, we will also discuss the use of other methods to establish binding energy scales, such as Fermi edge coupling and select doping (e.g., the Au dot approach).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Barr et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbe98e387cf7069868928e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1116/1.579868
Tery L. Barr
Health Canada
Sudipta Seal
University of Central Florida
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...