Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Although a median-income US family of four with employer-based health insurance saw its gross annual income increase from 76, 000 in 1999 to 99, 000 in 2009 (in current dollars), this gain was largely offset by increased spending to pay for health care. Monthly spending increases occurred in the family's health insurance premiums (from 490 to 1, 115), out-of-pocket health spending (from 135 to 235), and taxes devoted to health care (from 345 to 440). After accounting for price increases in other goods and services, the family had 95 more in monthly income to devote to nonhealth spending in 2009 than in 1999. By contrast, had the rate of health care cost growth not exceeded general inflation, the family would have had 545 more per month instead of 95-a difference of nearly 5, 400 per year. Even the 95 gain was artificial, because tax collections in 2009 were insufficient to cover actual increases in federal health spending. As a result, we argue, the burdens imposed on all payers by steadily rising health care spending can no longer be ignored.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David I. Auerbach
Brandeis University
Arthur L. Kellermann
Emory University
Health Affairs
RAND Corporation
Auerbach Associates (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Auerbach et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a18b34f8dcaf40f45cfa7b6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0585