Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the concordance of self-report measures of medication adherence (interview, diary, or questionnaire) with nonself-report measures of adherence (administrative claims, pill count or canister weight, plasma drug concentration, electronic monitors, or clinical opinion). METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify published reports in which self-report and nonself-report measures of adherence were used within the same study. The concordance of measures within each study was categorized as high, moderate, or low based on a comparison of the adherence estimates. RESULTS: Eight-six comparisons of self-report to nonself-report measures of adherence were identified. Thirty-seven of the 86 comparisons (43%) were categorized as highly concordant. However, concordance varied substantially by type of self-report measure and nonself-report measure. Self-report measures, in general, were highly concordant with electronic measures in only 17% of comparisons, whereas they were highly concordant with other types of nonself-report measures in 58% of comparisons (chi-square = 14.30, P <0.01). When comparing self-report measures, interviews had significantly lower concordance with nonself-report measures as compared with questionnaires or diaries (chi-square = 8.47, P = 0.01). In 15 comparisons of interviews with electronic measures, none of the comparisons were highly concordant, whereas questionnaires and diaries had moderate-to-high concordance with electronic measures in 12 of 16 comparisons (75%). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance of self-report and other measures of medication adherence varies widely based on the type of measures used. Questionnaires and diaries tend to have moderate-to-high concordance with other measures of medication adherence. However, interview-based self-reports are not concordant with electronic measures. Questionnaire and diary methods could be preferable to interviews for self-reported medication adherence.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mathew C. Garber
University of the Incarnate Word
David P. Nau
Ohio Northern University
Steven R. Erickson
University of Michigan
Medical Care
University of Michigan
Day Family Medicine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Garber et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f3d6814089a5783bde63b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000129496.05898.02
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: