Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In 1997, Jarzynski proved a remarkable equality that allows one to compute the equilibrium free-energy difference DeltaF between two states from the probability distribution of the nonequilibrium work W done on the system to switch between the states, e-DeltaF/kappaT =e-W/kappaT Jarzynski, C. (1997) Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 2690-2693. The Jarzynski equality provides a powerful free-energy difference estimator from a set of N irreversible experiments and is closely related to free-energy perturbation, a common computational technique for estimating free-energy differences. Despite the many applications of the Jarzynski estimator, its behavior is only poorly understood. In this article we derive the large N limit for the Jarzynski estimator bias, variance, and mean square error that is correct for arbitrary perturbations. We then analyze the properties of the Jarzynski estimator for all N when the probability distribution of work values is Gaussian, as occurs, for example, in the near-equilibrium regime. This allows us to quantitatively compare it to two other free-energy difference estimators: the mean work estimator and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem estimator. We show that, for near-equilibrium switching, the Jarzynski estimator is always superior to the mean work estimator and is even superior to the fluctuation-dissipation estimator for small N. The Jarzynski-estimator bias is shown to be the dominant source of error in many cases. Our expression for the bias is used to develop a bias-corrected Jarzynski free-energy difference estimator in the near-equilibrium regime.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
J Gore
University of Zimbabwe
Félix Ritort
Reial Acadèmia de Ciències i Arts de Barcelona
Carlos Bustamante
QB3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
University of California, Berkeley
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gore et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10ea64975881a5546459c8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1635159100