Heart rate responses to acute sympathetic challenge (cold pressor test and nitroprusside) did not significantly correlate with changes in norepinephrine or MSNA (P=NS).
Does heart rate accurately reflect acute and generalized changes in sympathetic activity during acute adrenergic challenge in healthy subjects?
Heart rate responses to sympathetic challenge do not quantitatively reflect the degree of acute and generalized adrenergic activation, suggesting NE and MSNA are better markers.
Effect estimate: r = -0.08 and r = -0.18
p-value: p=NS
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that heart rate has a limited value in reflecting the chronic state of adrenergic overdrive characterizing several cardiovascular diseases. Whether this also applies to the ability of heart rate to reflect acute and generalized changes in sympathetic activity is unknown. METHODS: In 20 healthy young subjects (age: 25.2 +/- 1.2 years, mean +/- SEM) we measured beat-to-beat blood pressure (Finapres), heart rate (HR, ECG), venous plasma norepinephrine (NE, high-performance liquid chromatography) and efferent postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA, microneurography) at rest and during a cold pressor test and two intravenous infusions of nitroprusside at increasing doses. RESULTS: Both cold pressor test and nitroprusside infusions triggered marked and significant increases in HR, plasma NE and MSNA; blood pressure showing an increase with cold pressor test and a reduction with nitroprusside. The magnitude of the responses was greater with the higher than with the lower dose of nitroprusside. The HR changes induced by cold pressor test were not significantly related to the concomitant NE and MSNA changes (r = -0.08 and r = -0.18, P = NS). This was also the case for the lower and the higher dose of nitroprusside (NE: r = -0.11 and r = 0.08; MSNA: r = 0.01 and r = -0.11, P = NS for all). In contrast NE and MSNA changes induced by cold pressor test and by the lower and the higher dose of nitroprusside were significantly related to each other (r = 0.70, r = 0.89 and r = 0.79 respectively, P < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In a given individual, HR responses to sympathetic challenge do not quantitatively reflect the degree of acute and generalized adrenergic activation. Qualitative information on the acute adrenergic effects of given stimuli should thus be based on the assessment of NE and MSNA rather than on HR changes.
Grassı et al. (2008) studied Healthy (n=20). Cold pressor test and intravenous nitroprusside infusions vs. Rest was evaluated on Correlation between heart rate changes and concomitant norepinephrine and MSNA changes (r = -0.08 and r = -0.18, p=NS). Heart rate responses to acute sympathetic challenge (cold pressor test and nitroprusside) did not significantly correlate with changes in norepinephrine or MSNA (P=NS).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: