Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In medical research, continuous variables are often converted into categorical variables by grouping values into two or more categories. We consider in detail issues pertaining to creating just two groups, a common approach in clinical research. We argue that the simplicity achieved is gained at a cost; dichotomization may create rather than avoid problems, notably a considerable loss of power and residual confounding. In addition, the use of a data-derived 'optimal' cutpoint leads to serious bias. We illustrate the impact of dichotomization of continuous predictor variables using as a detailed case study a randomized trial in primary biliary cirrhosis. Dichotomization of continuous data is unnecessary for statistical analysis and in particular should not be applied to explanatory variables in regression models.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Patrick Royston
Douglas G. Altman
Willi Sauerbrei
Statistics in Medicine
University Medical Center Freiburg
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Royston et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d73564779571b57e48f546 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2331
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: