Door-to-door blood pressure screening of 12,371 adults revealed that 20% initially had elevated blood pressure, but only 9% had sustained hypertension after repeated measurements.
Cross-Sectional (n=12,371)
No
Hypertension (n=12,371)
Door-to-door blood pressure screening
Prevalence of hypertension
The population of a community of 29,608 adults was screened door-to-door for elevated blood pressure. Of 12,371 adults screened, 20% were classified as hypertensive. After repeated blood-pressure measurement, however, there were only 9% with sustained hypertension, while 11% had labile hypertension. Sixty percent of the cases of sustained hypertension had been either undiagnosed, untreated, or inadequately treated. Eighty-two percent who initially were unaware of hypertension had labile hypertension after repeated blood-pressure measurement, and 18% were unaware of having, sustained hypertension. Labile hypertension was most prevalent in the young and decreased with age. In contrast, sustained hypertension was least prevalent in the young and increased with age. Labile hypertension was most prevalent in white men, and sustained hypertension was more prevalent in blacks than in whites. Labile hypertension represents a large segment (52%) of the population initially identified as having hypertension in a home blood-pressure survey.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert M. Carey
Preventive Cardiology
JAMA
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robert M. Carey (Mon,) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=12,371). Door-to-door blood pressure screening was evaluated on Prevalence of hypertension. Door-to-door blood pressure screening of 12,371 adults revealed that 20% initially had elevated blood pressure, but only 9% had sustained hypertension after repeated measurements.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11df32157ff1551221b1ed — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1976.03270080029027
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: