Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We describe a bootstrap investigation of the stability of a Cox proportional hazards regression model resulting from the analysis of a clinical trial of azathioprine versus placebo in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We have considered stability to refer both to the choice of variables included in the model and, more importantly, to the predictive ability of the model. In stepwise Cox regression analyses of 100 bootstrap samples using 17 candidate variables, the most frequently selected variables were those selected in the original analysis, and no other important variable was identified. Thus there was no reason to doubt the model obtained in the original analysis. For each patient in the trial, bootstrap confidence intervals were constructed for the estimated probability of surviving two years. It is shown graphically that these intervals are markedly wider than those obtained from the original model.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Douglas G. Altman
Cancer Research UK
Per Kragh Andersen
University of Copenhagen
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics Denmark
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Altman et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0824711e8b9db648ddf3ea — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780080702
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: