Does the CHA2DS2-VASc score improve prediction of stroke and thromboembolism compared to the CHADS2 score in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation not on vitamin K antagonists?
73,538 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation not treated with vitamin K antagonists in Denmark in the period 1997-2006.
Risk stratification using the CHA2DS2-VASc score
Risk stratification using the CHADS2 score
Stroke and thromboembolismhard clinical
The CHA2DS2-VASc score is superior to the CHADS2 score for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly for identifying truly low-risk patients.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the individual risk factors composing the CHADS(2) (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥ 75 years, Diabetes, previous Stroke) score and the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc (CHA(2)DS(2)-Vascular disease, Age 65-74 years, Sex category) score and to calculate the capability of the schemes to predict thromboembolism. DESIGN: Registry based cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide data on patients admitted to hospital with atrial fibrillation. Population All patients with atrial fibrillation not treated with vitamin K antagonists in Denmark in the period 1997-2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stroke and thromboembolism. RESULTS: Of 121,280 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, 73,538 (60.6%) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. In patients at "low risk" (score = 0), the rate of thromboembolism per 100 person years was 1.67 (95% confidence interval 1.47 to 1.89) with CHADS(2) and 0.78 (0.58 to 1.04) with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc at one year's follow-up. In patients at "intermediate risk" (score = 1), this rate was 4.75 (4.45 to 5.07) with CHADS(2) and 2.01 (1.70 to 2.36) with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc. The rate of thromboembolism depended on the individual risk factors composing the scores, and both schemes underestimated the risk associated with previous thromboembolic events. When patients were categorised into low, intermediate, and high risk groups, C statistics at 10 years' follow-up were 0.812 (0.796 to 0.827) with CHADS(2) and 0.888 (0.875 to 0.900) with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc. CONCLUSIONS: The risk associated with a specific risk stratification score depended on the risk factors composing the score. CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc performed better than CHADS(2) in predicting patients at high risk, and those categorised as low risk by CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc were truly at low risk for thromboembolism.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonas Bjerring Olesen
General Cardiology
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Electrophysiology
Mona Hansen
Akershus University Hospital
BMJ
University of Birmingham
Gentofte Hospital
Birmingham City Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Olesen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69f14c16c0d8017361865c10 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d124