EEG studies link expert sports performance to changes in alpha rhythms and P300 effects, though evidence for neurofeedback enhancing performance remains limited.
Does neurofeedback or EEG monitoring improve or correlate with sports performance?
While neurofeedback currently lacks strong evidence for enhancing sports performance, mobile EEG technology offers new opportunities to study neural correlates in real-world sporting environments.
In the high stakes world of International sport even the smallest change in performance can make the difference between success and failure, leading sports professionals to become increasingly interested in the potential benefits of neuroimaging. Here we describe evidence from EEG studies that either identify neural signals associated with expertise in sport, or employ neurofeedback to improve performance. Evidence for the validity of neurofeedback as a technique for enhancing sports performance remains limited. By contrast, progress in characterizing the neural correlates of sporting behavior is clear: frequency domain studies link expert performance to changes in alpha rhythms, whilst time-domain studies link expertise in response evaluation and motor output with modulations of P300 effects and readiness potentials. Despite early promise, however, findings have had relatively little impact for sports professionals, at least in part because there has been a mismatch between lab tasks and real sporting activity. After selectively reviewing existing findings and outlining limitations, we highlight developments in mobile EEG technology that offer new opportunities for sports neuroscience.
Park et al. (Sat,) conducted a review in Sports performance. EEG and neurofeedback was evaluated. EEG studies link expert sports performance to changes in alpha rhythms and P300 effects, though evidence for neurofeedback enhancing performance remains limited.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: