General anesthesia during cesarean delivery was associated with a case-fatality rate of 6.5 per million versus 3.8 per million for regional anesthesia (RR 1.7; 95% CI 0.6-4.6; P=.2) in 1997-2002.
Observational (n=86)
Yes
Does the type of anesthesia (general vs regional) affect maternal mortality during cesarean delivery, and how have anesthesia-related maternal mortality rates changed over time?
Anesthesia-related maternal mortality in the US decreased by nearly 60% between 1979-1990 and 1991-2002, with the mortality risk ratio between general and regional anesthesia narrowing to 1.7 (not statistically significant) in 1997-2002.
Effect estimate: RR 1.7 (95% CI 0.6-4.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.5% vs 3.8%
p-value: p=.2
OBJECTIVE: To examine 12 years of anesthesia-related maternal deaths from 1991 to 2002 and compare them with data from 1979 to 1990, to estimate trends in anesthesia-related maternal mortality over time, and to compare the risks of general and regional anesthesia during cesarean delivery. METHODS: The authors reviewed anesthesia-related maternal deaths that occurred from 1991 to 2002. Type of anesthesia involved, mode of delivery, and cause of death were determined. Pregnancy-related mortality ratios, defined as pregnancy-related deaths due to anesthesia per million live births were calculated. Case fatality rates were estimated by applying a national estimate of the proportion of regional and general anesthetics to the national cesarean delivery rate. RESULTS: Eighty-six pregnancy-related deaths were associated with complications of anesthesia, or 1.6% of total pregnancy-related deaths. Pregnancy-related mortality ratios for deaths related to anesthesia is 1.2 per million live births for 1991-2002, a decrease of 59% from 1979-1990. Deaths mostly occurred among younger women, but the percentage of deaths among women aged 35-39 years increased substantially. Delivery method could not be determined in 14%, but the remaining 86% were undergoing cesarean delivery. Case-fatality rates for general anesthesia were 16.8 per million in 1991-1996 and 6.5 per million in 1997-2002, and for regional anesthesia were 2.5 and 3.8 per million, respectively. The resulting risk ratio between the two techniques for 1997-2002 was 1.7 (confidence interval 0.6-4.6, P=.2). CONCLUSION: Anesthetic-related maternal mortality decreased nearly 60% when data from 1979-1990 were compared with data from 1991-2002. Although case-fatality rates for general anesthesia are falling, rates for regional anesthesia are rising. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Hawkins et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Anesthesia-related maternal mortality (n=86). General anesthesia vs. Regional anesthesia was evaluated on Case-fatality rate during cesarean delivery (per million) (RR 1.7, 95% CI 0.6-4.6, p=.2). General anesthesia during cesarean delivery was associated with a case-fatality rate of 6.5 per million versus 3.8 per million for regional anesthesia (RR 1.7; 95% CI 0.6-4.6; P=.2) in 1997-2002.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: