Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AbstractIt is well known that statistical power calculations can be valuable in planning an experiment. There is also a large literature advocating that power calculations be made whenever one performs a statistical test of a hypothesis and one obtains a statistically nonsignificant result. Advocates of such post-experiment power calculations claim the calculations should be used to aid in the interpretation of the experimental results. This approach, which appears in various forms, is fundamentally flawed. We document that the problem is extensive and present arguments to demonstrate the flaw in the logic.KEY WORDS: Bioequivalence testingBurden of proofObserved powerRetrospective power analysisStatistical powerType II error
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John M. Hoenig
William & Mary
Dennis M. Heisey
United States Geological Survey
The American Statistician
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hoenig et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d91d12ccb0bba5a56842d5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001300339897
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: