Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) self-care is extremely challenging and few people master it. Self-care was defined as an active, cognitive process in which persons engage for the purpose of maintaining their health (maintenance) and managing symptoms (management). AIM: To examine the contribution of attitudes, self-efficacy, and cognition to HF self-care management. METHODS: In this mixed methods study, 41 individuals (63.4% male, 68.3% Caucasian, mean age 49.17 (10.51) years, 58.5% NYHA III, median ejection fraction 30%) were interviewed and completed instruments on HF self-care, cognition, and physical functioning. Content analysis of narrative data revealed themes of self-care management practices, attitudes and self-efficacy towards self-care. Non-parametric tests assessed differences based on the types identified in the content analysis. RESULTS: A self-care typology was constructed from the data: experts, novices and inconsistent. There were statistically significant differences (p=0.001) in self-care practices among types and variance in attitudes, self-efficacy, and cognition. Experts had experience and skill in self-care, which novices lacked, and positive attitudes and self-efficacy that aligned with their behaviors. Most patients (71%) were classified as inconsistent, a self-care type associated with impaired cognition, poor physical functioning, negative attitudes, and poor self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: This typology provides insight into how expertise in self-care develops and the reasons why it is not always sustained.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Victoria Vaughan Dickson
Heart Failure & Transplant
Janet A. Deatrick
University of Pennsylvania
Bárbara Riegel
Heart Failure & Transplant
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
University of Pennsylvania
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dickson et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20cc5de5931e99b71b5bae — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.11.005
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: