Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper provides a framework for addressing the question of when transactions should be carried out within a firm and when through the market. Following Grossman and Hart, we identify a firm with the assets that its owners control. We argue that the crucial difference for party 1 between owning a firm (integration) and contracting for a service from another party 2 who owns this firm (nonintegration) is that, under integration, party 1 can selectively fire the workers of the firm (including party 2), whereas under nonintegration he can "fire" (i.e., stop dealing with) only the entire firm: the combination of party 2, the workers, and the firm's assets. We use this idea to study how changes in ownership affect the incentives of employees as well as those of owner-managers. Copyright 1990 by University of Chicago Press.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oliver Hart
University of Colorado Boulder
John Moore
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Journal of Political Economy
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
London School of Economics and Political Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hart et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d030cefec26621c509f47b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261729