Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) improves hemoglobin A1c (A1C) and hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on prandial insulin; however, it has not been tested in people with T2DM not taking prandial insulin. We evaluated the utility of RT-CGM in people with T2DM on a variety of treatment modalities except prandial insulin. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, 52-week, two-arm, randomized trial comparing RT-CGM (n = 50) versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) (n = 50) in people with T2DM not taking prandial insulin. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring was used for four 2-week cycles (2 weeks on/1 week off). All patients were managed by their usual provider. This article reports on changes in A1C 0-12 weeks. RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) decline in A1C at 12 weeks was 1.0% (± 1.1%) in the RT-CGM group and 0.5% (± 0.8%) in the SMBG group (p = .006). There were no group differences in the net change in number or dosage of hypoglycemic medications. Those who used the RT-CGM for ≥ 48 days (per protocol) reduced their A1C by 1.2% (± 1.1%) versus 0.6% (± 1.1%) in those who used it <48 days (p = .003). Multiple regression analyses statistically adjusting for baseline A1C, an indicator for usage, and known confounders confirmed the observed differences between treatment groups were robust (p = .009). There was no improvement in weight or blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring significantly improves A1C compared with SMBG in patients with T2DM not taking prandial insulin. This technology might benefit a wider population of people with diabetes than previously thought.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicole Ehrhardt
University of Washington
Mary Chellappa
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
M. Susan Walker
Fort Lewis College
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ehrhardt et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e1f426145f5790c27a0a2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681100500320
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: