Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We address a commonly asked question about gene expression data sets: "What functional classes of genes are most interesting in the data?" In the methods we present, expression data is partitioned into classes based on existing annotation schemes. Each class is then given three separately derived "interest" scores. The first score is based on an assessment of the statistical significance of gene expression changes experienced by members of the class, in the context of the experimental design. The second is based on the co-expression of genes in the class. The third score is based on the learnability of the classification. We show that all three methods reveal significant classes in each of three different gene expression data sets. Many classes are identified by one method but not the others, indicating that the methods are complementary. The classes identified are in many cases of clear relevance to the experiment. Our results suggest that these class scoring methods are useful tools for exploring gene expression data.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Paul Pavlidis
Darrin P. Lewis
William Stafford Noble
Columbia University
New York Genome Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pavlidis et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a067b8c562f02339273b0f1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812799623_0044