Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
CONSIDERABLE enthusiasm has developed in recent years about the use of quantitative methods to guide the allocation of health-care resources. These approaches attempt to assign specific numerical values to the benefits of medical interventions of various kinds, as well as to their costs. Once quantified, costs and outcomes are then compared to indicate which health-care interventions make the most efficient use of available resources. Cost-benefit analysis reduces all factors to a common unit of measurement, generally dollars; cost-effectiveness analysis likewise expresses treatment costs in dollars, but leaves out-comes in terms more recognizable to the clinician—e.g., number of patients with hypertension . . .
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jerry Avorn
Brigham and Women's Hospital
New England Journal of Medicine
Harvard University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jerry Avorn (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e19f6f8c10024cd27a361 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198405173102005
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: