This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
CONSIDERABLE enthusiasm has developed in recent years about the use of quantitative methods to guide the allocation of health-care resources. These approaches attempt to assign specific numerical values to the benefits of medical interventions of various kinds, as well as to their costs. Once quantified, costs and outcomes are then compared to indicate which health-care interventions make the most efficient use of available resources. Cost-benefit analysis reduces all factors to a common unit of measurement, generally dollars; cost-effectiveness analysis likewise expresses treatment costs in dollars, but leaves out-comes in terms more recognizable to the clinician—e.g., number of patients with hypertension . . .
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jerry Avorn (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: