Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This paper considers some key issues that help to evaluate whether or not the promotion of compact cities is a worthwhile planning goal. These are: the pressures on prime agricultural land; residential density preferences; energy resource savings; the potential for expanding transit use and promoting TODs (transit-oriented developments); the costs and benefits of suburbanization; the efficiency gains from compactness; the impact of telecommunications on the density of development; the prospects for downtowns; the influence of rent-seeking on the promotion of downtown projects; the social equity of compactness; and the effects of competition among cities. Our evaluation of these issues does not support the case for promoting compact cities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peter Gordon
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Harry W. Richardson
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Journal of the American Planning Association
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gordon et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153f6e3e2c796fc981f80a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975727
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: