Inspiration significantly reduced the peak velocity and velocity-time integral of pulmonary venous flow during both systole and diastole compared to expiration in anesthetized dogs.
Observational (n=12)
Does the respiratory cycle affect pulmonary venous flow and does the cardiac cycle affect pulmonary venous diameter in anesthetized dogs?
Respiration significantly affects pulmonary venous flow variables in anesthetized dogs, and pulmonary venous diameter varies dynamically during the cardiac cycle, suggesting caution when estimating flow volume using Doppler.
We investigated 12 anesthetized normal dogs using transesophageal echocardiography to understand the effects of respiration on the pulmonary venous flow. Additionally, we observed whether the diameter of the pulmonary vein changes with the heart beat. The pulsed Doppler wave form of pulmonary venous flow predominantly demonstrated two backward flows, with one peak occurring during ventricular systole and another during ventricular diastole. Sometimes a small forward flow occurred during left atrial contraction. In comparison with expiration, the peak velocity and velocity-time integral of the flow wave under inspiration occurred during both systole and diastole were significantly smaller. The diameter of the pulmonary vein decreased during left atrial contraction and increased during left ventricular systole and diastole.
CHIANG et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Normal dogs (n=12). Inspiration vs. Expiration was evaluated on Peak velocity and velocity-time integral of pulmonary venous flow. Inspiration significantly reduced the peak velocity and velocity-time integral of pulmonary venous flow during both systole and diastole compared to expiration in anesthetized dogs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: