Once-daily oral rivaroxaban (20, 30, or 40 mg) yielded primary efficacy outcome rates of 6.1%, 5.4%, and 6.6%, respectively, compared to 9.9% with standard therapy for deep vein thrombosis.
RCT (n=543)
Double-blind and open-label
Randomized
We performed a randomized dose-ranging study, double-blind for rivaroxaban doses and open-label for the comparator (low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists) to assess the optimal dose of rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. A total of 543 patients with acute deep-venous thrombosis received rivaroxaban 20, 30, or 40 mg once daily or comparator. Treatment lasted for 84 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the 3-month incidence of the composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolic complications and asymptomatic deterioration in thrombotic burden as assessed by comparison of ultrasound and perfusion lung scanning at day 84 with baseline. The main safety outcome was the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. A total of 449 (83%) of the 543 patients could be included in the per-protocol population. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.1%, 5.4%, and 6.6% of the rivaroxaban 20-, 30-, and 40-mg treatment groups, respectively, and in 9.9% of those receiving standard therapy. The main safety outcome occurred in 5.9%, 6.0%, and 2.2% of the rivaroxaban 20-, 30-, and 40-mg treatment groups, respectively, and in 8.8% of those receiving standard therapy. These results with simple fixed-dose oral regimens justify phase 3 evaluations (www.ClinicalTrials.gov no.NCT00395772).
Büller et al. (Sat,) conducted a rct in Acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (n=543). Rivaroxaban vs. Low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists was evaluated on 3-month incidence of the composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolic complications and asymptomatic deterioration in thrombotic burden. Once-daily oral rivaroxaban (20, 30, or 40 mg) yielded primary efficacy outcome rates of 6.1%, 5.4%, and 6.6%, respectively, compared to 9.9% with standard therapy for deep vein thrombosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: