Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The derivation of the components n and k of the complex refractive index of a thin film from measurements, at normal incidence, of reflectance R and transmittance T is complicated by the existence of multiple solutions of the relevant equations. It is shown that, although use of Tomlin's expressions for (1 ± R )/ T rather than Heavens's explicit formulae for R and T separately simplifies the problem, it is still necessary to consider very carefully the multiple solutions. A procedure is given for determining the correct solutions for n and k , and also for accurately fixing the film thickness, provided that the film is a homogeneous single layer on a substrate. Some experimental results have not yielded to this treatment and in these cases it has been found necessary to assume the presence of a surface layer (often, but not necessarily, an oxide layer) and to make use of the equations in the preceding paper which relate to a double layer on a substrate. It is shown how this may be done in such a way as to obtain the correct dispersion curve for the material, together with its thickness, and that of the surface layer.
Denton et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: