Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The present study examined the construct of ambivalence over emotional expression proposed by King and Emmons (1990) in the Chinese context, and identified a factor structure different from those proposed in previous Western studies. The results of this study provided discriminant validity for this newly extracted two‐factor structure of ambivalence, viz., Emotional Rumination and Emotional Suppression. Emotional Rumination was significantly predicted by the personality scales of introversion and inferiority, and the belief dimension of fate control, whereas Emotional Suppression was predicted by the personality scales of diversity, face, and harmony, and the belief dimension of social complexity. The different effects of Emotional Rumination and Emotional Suppression in predicting life satisfaction showed that emotional experience has its own specific characteristics in Chinese culture, and that responding to its emic characteristics will yield a more culturally responsive understanding of emotional experience and expression. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sylvia Xiaohua Chen
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Fanny M. Cheung
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Michael Harris Bond
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
European Journal of Personality
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd18d75d98120808509677 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.538